.................................................................................................................................................................
...


"The Executive Board Information Update"
 or should it be the
"Priority Report"
or is it
Cover up?

 
 

As you go through this ask yourself this question:
 Do you think it could be called the  "The Cover-up?"

  

After I was voted off the board I saw an  attorney because this had nothing to do with  facts.  This Attorney  requested the items pertaining to my removal be sent to him.  I did not pay much attention to this for some time. I more or less left it up to my attorney to take care of this. I was sure it was no  big deal as the charges were more like a note from the principal that I did not obey.  My Attorney said that it would be cheaper to buy a Museum than to take this to court.

 He said it would be ok to put the e-mail and anything as written facts  on my web page. I had no idea how much I had and what its meaning was, once I started through this.  Living in Seneca in the past did not alert me to such trash possibilities.  Most people tell it as it is,  but  there has been some far out things going about lately. I spent all my time trying to keep the software running in spite of  deletions. 

Have you saved  the Annual Report 2006-2007? -- Keep it and save it.   It takes some freak thing like this to make things  valuable. I had mine and wondered what to do about it a it was full of creations.   When the Annual Report appeared amount the things that was sent to my Attorney it surprised me.  I was not sure I kept mine  to campier and the one sheet I wondered  was not there.  This is very good proof of what they are hiding when one sheet of a report is missing.  The  Annual Report of 2006 2007  mailed to me is not the same.     There were three things that were different and when a person starts to rewrite the past it time to get them out the Historical Society.  

There are three paragraph in that report that seemed to have a problem.

Why were these three paragraphs removed on the new document? see links at bottom of page
 

The last three paragraphs did not pass the test to stay.  This page titled "Priority Report" immediately above and the items missing have ties to the thing that disturbed me the most.   These items were on my priorities  list to fix. 

Our annual report got fixed  -- look below.

 

  

   


You will see this explained on three other  pages.

The  first being   Millie Stallbaumer Memorial Fund. 
This was  the Mother of our  five Children. We called her  Millie,
There was a disagreement on how the money we donated in honor of my wife and was to be spent. I never even had a chance to use them before I was removed from the board.    Under false charges.    This was more then a  problem.

The second is   Settling Nemaha County  
 This important and likely why it was left out is that the number of the items are the same as the day that Dean Rail took over the Computer.  The number are the same as they were the day the computer crashed on April 6, 2007,  This link is very high teck and difficult to understand for  those with little database training,  Knowing how to test what you do in small amounts will save you much trouble. The total of each item as Objects, photos, archive and books never changed from the time the computer  crashed to the day the annual  report was made. I wanted to show DarlAnn and later Dean the mess it was in but he did not want to see or talk about this.

The third  is  The Heritage Trust Fund Grand
This was to have been for the study and repair the Porch on the old Jail Building. The third  items I did not agree with  the way it wad handled. As I look back I should have been more forceful.  Banged the table and shouted. The world is not like that and some things need to be know so they can be stopped.  No one  wanted to  even talk about these thing that nearly eaten me up.    I figured I have time yet  to correct this.  . 

I am charged with not  going with the board decision.  I can not go along with illegal things. I can not go along with Cover-up and that is what Mr. O'Keefe has done.  I can not go along with spending $31,000.00 on a book when the money was received to repair the porch.   I can not take $3,300 for adding things to computer and do a very poor job to the extend they can not be found in the computer because over  half have been lost from the search because the lady in charge wants to delete more files.   After some of us have spent many hours to get this done and Dean does not care too look at it and  try and per mote himself as some one who know computers.    Check out these figures on the the computer files. This is part of heritage of 2006  2007 2008  and 2009. Can we get a grant to write the truth about it?  I have.

   Does Mr. O'Keefe know that he was trying to cover-up.  I also very much doubt it he was told all the details.

Changing  historical records is  not consistent with what we are expected to do in a Historical Society. When we change a record it is a false record. Perhaps those who did not grow up here only care how they appear  in print.  I would like to see the truth.  

The big problem was that I was not a Yes Person.  I did not go along with some of the things for good reason.

  
 

Return to Index

  
 
...